Stem Cell Therapy Research

Stem Cell Therapy Research

Clinical trial with control: variables related to the outcomes of stem cell therapy.

幹細胞療法について

Ref 20

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

T2DM156 (T), 62 (C)18-60 y (T=8.6 ± 6.5, C=7.3 ± 6.3)

‍Follow Up

1-2-3 mo, every 3 mo until -36 mo

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

T: Auto BM-MNC Dose ? DPA, 1xC: ( – )

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T: D, E, PST, BGM-MAC: D, E, PST, IIT, BGM-MA

T2DM Related Outcome

HbA1c and C peptide in treatment were significantly better than either pre-therapy values or control.In Treatment:18/56 patients insulin was discontinued;19/56 insulin reduction > 50%, 10/56 insulin reduction 15-50%, 9/56 –non responderIn control: 40/62 patients – insulin requirement increased > 50%, 22/62 patients – increased 15-45%.

Ref 21

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

T2DM20 (MNC-HBO), 20 (MNC), 20 (C1=HBO), 20 (C2)40-65 y (2 – 15 y)

Follow Up

3-6-9-12 mo

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

Auto BM-MNCT1: MNC-HBO= 3641.2 ± 1585.4 MT2: MNC= 4012.5 ± 1431.9MDPA – 10 minutes 1x

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T and C: D, L, PST, SBGM- IA

T2DM Related Outcome

Insulin dose reduction at 12 mo in T1 and T2, C1, C2 – unchangedInsulin free: T1: 1/20, T2: 2/20Improvement at 12 mo in AUC C-Pep of T1= T2 > C1, and AUC Ins of T1 and T2.HbA1c at 3, 6, 9 and 12 mo -reduced significantly both in T1 and T2, but stable in C1 and C2.FBG at 6, 9 and 12 months – T1 and T2 -reduced Fasting C peptide at 3, 6, 9 and 12 mo significantly elevated in T1 and T2, but remained stable in C1 and C2

Ref 22

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

T2DM11 (T), 10 (C)T=46.5–56 y (10-15.5 y)C= 52.5–56 y (16-21 y)

Follow Up

2-4-6-8-10- 12wk-4-5-6- 9-12 mo

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

T: auto BM- MNC – 290 M (220 -380 M)C: sham, saline SP/DA -1x after 12 wk:PB- GCSF- leucopheresis MNC – 490 (290–730M)C: sham, saline –IV-1x

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T and C: D, L, E, W-SBGM – IA

T2DM Related Outcome

12 mo: 50% Insulin reduction-Tr: 9/11 = 82%, -C:0/10, p= 0.002Insulin red Tr > C (p=0.001, 6 mo), (p=0.004, 12 mo)HbA1C maintenance (

<7%): Tr 10/11 (91%), C 6/10 (60%), p= 0.167
Increase in glucagon stimulated C peptide: Tr > C, p= 0.036
Correlation insulin decrease-C peptide increase r= 0.8, p=0.01)

Ref 23

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

T2DM10 (MSC), 10 (MNC), 10 (C)MSC= 36-58 (8-23) MNC= 39.5-50 (8.5-15) C= 43-59 (9-15)

Follow Up

2-4-8-12- wk-6-9-12 mo

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

AutoBM-MSC-P4-5 – 1M/ kg BWAuto BM-MNC – 1B/patient C= vit. B complex SPDA – 1x

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T and C: L, PST,D-SBGM- IA

T2DM Related Outcome

6/10 (MSC), 6/10 (MNC), 0/10 (C) achieved primary end point: 50% insulin requirement reduction, while maintaining HbA1c

<7.0% -> significant difference
MNC group: Increase in glucagon stimulated C peptide
MSC group: Improvement in insulin sensitivity index and increase in IRS-1 gene expression

Ref 24

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

T2DM31 (T), 30(C) 18-60 y(T=8.93±5.67 C=8.3±6.07)

Follow Up

36 mo

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

T: Wharton jelly MSC P41M/kg BWC: SalineIV – 2x (interval 4 wk)

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T and C: D, E, PST, SBGM- MA

T2DM Related Outcome

Blood glucose, HbA1c, Cpeptide, homeostasis model assessment of pancreatic islet cell function signifi- cantly improved- compared to control.

Incidence of diabetic complications: Tr – no increase vs baseline, C: 4/30- new diabetic retinopathy, 3/30 new diabetic neuropathy 3/30 new diabetic nephropathy –> statistically significant difference (Tr vs C, P= 0.007)

Insulin dose reduction:Tr: 18/31- 50% insulin dose reduction ( where 10/31 – insulin free from 311 mo postWJMSC, and insulin free duration 12.5±6.8 months), 5/31 -1550% reduction, and 8/31 non responder. Control: 14/30: >50% insulin dose increase, 16/30: 1545% insulin dose increase – 30/30 – non responder

Ref 25

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

T2DM + impotence2 7 (T), 3 (C)57-87 (12-52 y, impo- tence minimal 6 months)

Follow Up

2wk – 11 mo

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

T: UCB SC -His tos- tem, ABO, HLA- ABC, DR, and sex- matched – 15MC: saline Injection – CC -1x

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T and C:PST, D-SBGM-MA

T2DM Related Outcome

Tr: Blood glucose levels decreased by 2 weeks, and medication dosages were reduced for 4 to 7 months (6/7). HbA1c levels improved after treatment for up to 3 to 4 months (7/7)Reduced insulin dose after 1 month (2/7)Control: no improvement in blood glucose level, HbA1c, and insulin dose.

Ref 26

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

T2DM 315 (T1), 15 (T2), 15 (T3), 3×5 C)T1= 57.7±8.2y (10.8± 7.3y )T2= 55.3±11.4y (10.2± 5.7y)T3= 57.2 ±6.6y (9.6±4.5y)C= 58.7 ±7.3y (9.8±6.7y)

Follow Up

12 wk 2y post study

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

MPC- P(?) Rexleme- strocel-L – mesoblas Inc, cryo-thawedT1=0.3 M/kg T2=1 M/kg T3=2 M/kg C= placebo IV- 45 minutes 1X

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T and C: L, PST, BGM-RT

T2DM Related Outcome

Tr: HbA1c – reduced – at all time points after week 1, C: a small increase in HbA1cClinical target HbA1c

<7% was achieved by 0/15 of Control, 2/15 of T1, 1/15 of T2, and 5/15 of T3 (P < 0.05)
Glycemic rescue therapy was required by: 1/15 of Con- trol, 2/15 of T1, 0/15 of T2, 1/15 of T3.

Ref 27

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

T2DM413 (T), 13 (C) 10-58 y (0.5 – 11 y)

Follow Up

1y

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

Hu fetal liver HSC – 35-55 M (20% CD34)- cryo-thawedSaline (C) IV – 1x

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T and C: BGM-FU

T2DM Related Outcome

Up to 1 y, no significant improvement in fasting blood glucose, and C peptide compared to control.Improvement in – HbA1c only at 6th mo: 7.9±1.3 in treatment vs 7.0 ± 0.86 in control (p=0.046).None of the treatment become insulin free.

Reference (Ref) number, T2DM = Type 2 diabetes mellitus, treatment control allocation: 1 patient option, 2 successive: 2 Treatment – 1 Control, others: random, 3 single-blind multi-center (18 – USA), 4 = T2DM and T1DM, T = treatment, C = control, y = year(s), MNC = mononuclear cell, HBO = hyperbaric oxygen, MSC = mesenchymal stem cell, mo = month(s), wk = week(s), SC = stem cell, Auto = autologous, BM = bone marrow, ? = data not available, DPA = dorsal pancreatic artery/substitute, M = million, SP/DA = superior pancreatic or duodenal artery, PB = peripheral blood, GCSF = granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, IV = intravenous, P = passage, BW = body weight, B = billion, vit. = vitamin, SPDA = superior pancreaticoduodenal artery, UCB = umbilical cord blood, CC = corpora cavernosa (penile root clamped with a band for 30 min), MPC = mesenchymal progenitor cell, cryo = cryopreserved, hu = human, HSC = hematopoietic stem cell, cryo = cryopreserved, D = diet, E = exercise, PST = previous standard therapy, BGM = blood glucose monitoring, MA = medication adjustment, IIT = insulin intensification therapy, L = lifestyle, SGBM = self-blood glucose monitoring, IA = insulin adjustment, W-SGBM = weekly SGBM, D-SGBM = daily SGBM (minimum 5 points/week), RT = rescue therapy using oral anti-diabetic agents, except thiazolidinediones in cases of unacceptable hyperglycemia, FU = follow-up.

Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2018(13)"Towards Standardized Stem Cell Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review"Jeanne Adiwinata Pawitan, Zheng Yang, Ying Nan Wu, and Eng Hin Lee

[20] Hu J, Li C, Wang L, et al. Long-term effects of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr J 2012; 59(11): 1031-9.
[21] Wu Z, Cai J, Chen J, et al. Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell infusion and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial. Cytotherapy 2014; 16: 258-65.
[22] Bhansali A, Asokumar P, Walia R, et al. Efficacy and safety of autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell transplantation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Cell Transplant 2014; 23(9): 1075-85.
[23] Bhansali A, Upreti V, Khandelwal N, et al. Efficacy of autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell transplantation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Stem Cells Dev 2009; 18(10): 1407-16.
[24] Hu J, Wang Y, Gong H, et al. Long-term effects and safety of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells in type 2 diabetes. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2016; 12(3): 1857-66.
[25] Bahk JY, Jung JH, Han H, Min SK, Lee YS. Treatment of diabetic impotence with umbilical cord blood stem cell intracavernosal transplant: preliminary report of 7 cases. Exp Clin Transplant 2010; 8(2): 150-60.
[26] Skyler JS, Fonseca VA, Segal KR, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells in type 2 diabetes: A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation safety and tolerability pilot study. Diabetes Care 2015; 38(9): 1742-9.
[27] Ghodsi M, Heshmat R, Amoli M, et al. The effect of fetal liver-derived cell suspension allotransplantation on diabetic patients: first year of follow-up. Acta Med Iran 2012; 50(8): 541-6.

Ref

Diagnosis Number of Cases – Age (Duration of T2DM)

Follow up

Source -SC Type – Passage, dose, Route, Repeat, Interval

Other T2DM Related Therapy

T2DM Related Outcome

20

T2DM156 (T), 62 (C)18-60 y (T=8.6 ± 6.5, C=7.3 ± 6.3)

1-2-3 mo, every 3 mo until -36 mo

T: Auto BM-MNC Dose ? DPA, 1xC: ( – )

T: D, E, PST, BGM-MAC: D, E, PST, IIT, BGM-MA

HbA1c and C peptide in treatment were significantly better than either pre-therapy values or control.In Treatment:18/56 patients insulin was discontinued;19/56 insulin reduction > 50%, 10/56 insulin reduction 15-50%, 9/56 –non responderIn control: 40/62 patients – insulin requirement increased > 50%, 22/62 patients – increased 15-45%.

Licenses

幹細胞療法について

A license is required to provide regenerative medicine In order to provide regenerative medicine, based on the Act on Ensuring the Safety of Regenerative Medicine, a specific authorized regenerative medicine committee has It must be reviewed by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and accepted by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Artisan Clinic Hibiya is a medical institution that has been accepted by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare for a provision plan for knee joint stem cell administration.

Contact Us

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.